Sunday, August 13, 2017

Blog Fodder!

While checking to see if I had received any mail yesterday, I opened my door to find a sparkling new advertisement for a local church resting its cute little paper arms comfortably around my door handle.  I get these flyers from time to time - they must know how much I love them - and normally I just throw them in the recycle bin.  But as you'll see, this time I just had to share.

This delightful advertisement comes from the lovely folks running the New Heights Baptist Church in Wylie, Texas.

Let's review the front first:

I'm not really sure who that late Baby-boomer/early GenX Glamour Shots couple is on the front because oddly, they never disclosed it.  But boy!  Did they ever hit the ground running with that whole, "... during a time of pluralism, ecumenism, and humanism," bit!

And that's my cue, folks.  Let's crack our secular knuckles and get this party started.

First of all, random white couple from the NHBC of Wylie, if you're addressing pluralism in the political sense, then that is who we are as a nation.  If you're addressing pluralism from a religious perspective, then you're either unable to recognize or unwilling to admit that you are a religious product of the circumstances of the region of your birth.  Nothing more.  You cannot be so na├»ve to think that if either of you arbitrarily pictured humans were born to parents in say, Iraq, that you'd still be Christian.

That whole ecumenism thing?  Sorry well dressed, indiscriminate couple, that's on you and yours.  Don't come crying to the rest of us about ecumenism when it was people like you two that decided to marry religion with politics back in the 70's.  It was you and yours that accepted the term, "Christian" to mean everyone whose religion is based on the Bible.  That includes the Catholics, Orthodox, Pentecostals, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians, and the various Baptists roaming about the United States; not just the Southern Baptists that you appear to like so much.  Stop whining about the twisted political creature you yourself created.

Now as a humanist myself, I'll give you the humanism thing.  I fully expect that a well manicured, sparkling-toothed Southern Baptist couple would most likely be at odds with rational thinking, evidence based philosophy.  You are who you are, no?

"Be sure you are going to heaven!"  Hmph.  It's always been amazing to me how much fear is utilized in their publications.  Did you notice the implied, "And not the OTHER place"?  That never gets old.  Oh, and how arrogant and dimwitted does a person have to be to feel they have the right to speak for the almighty?  Last I checked, the big Gal upstairs has the keys to the heavenly door, not you.

Moving on.

Of the four verses printed on the front, just make note of numbers 1 and 2 in the list.  We'll come back to those in a bit.  As for the back of the flyer, the NHBC of Wylie provides us with the latest round of the childish, "My god is better than your god!" squabble, with just a dash of Islamophobia:

Admittedly, there's a lot going on back here.  I mean, a LOT.  And rather than go line by line, which I simply do not have the literary fortitude to do, I'll just offer a general impression of this list and pick a few of these to address specifically.

Remember this...  If in the future you ever need an extraordinarily perfect example of the very definition of a Straw man argument, then this, my friends, is it.  Wow.  I don't think I've ever seen a list that goes so over-the-top with reductive, cherry-picked elementary school level arguments about two different religions.  Plus, the way this dogmatic rhetoric is written, it really does give you an idea of the type of audience they are addressing.  There's an underlying, "Us versus THEM!" message here that is very, very dangerous with the current political climate.  They know there are hundreds of new families with different cultures and religions moving into our area, and they know most people that already live here understand very, very little about those various cultures and religions.  So like any good Baptist church, they're exploiting it.

For example, the matching lines, "God loves all people," and, "Allah hates unbelievers."  This is so woefully over simplified that it's borderline grotesque.  Dismissing the fact that this argument is specifically designed to cater to their "side", it is also easily refuted with a minimal knowledge of the Bible (or a search on Google.)  Psalm 5, Psalm 11, Leviticus 20, Proverbs 6... just to name a few.  And going back to the second verse listed on the front, Romans 6, eternal death does not sound very loving to me or anyone else that doesn't accept your tenets.  The Abrahamic gods are all notoriously plagued with frivolous, unrefined human failings.  And your Christian god is no different - only the point of view of your argument.

"Religious freedom"?  Excuse me?  Either you do not understand what freedom really is, or you do not consider anyone else's religion a true religion.  I don't know, I'm so confused by that line that now I'm thinking that it may be both.  If "Biblical Christianity" (is there such a thing as non-Biblical Christianity?) allows religious freedom, then why do you even need this flyer in the first place?

"Compatible with US Constitution"?  Wrong.  And you know it.  This is just another attempt at the Christian-right/religious-right in this country to legitimize the radical notion that the Constitution of the United States was inspired by the Bible.  And with this line, you are attempting to make that idea mainstream.  This disgusting concept from the religious right is demonstrably false, which makes you a liar.  And if memory serves, that breaks one of your top ten commandments.  Stop it.

"Peaceful coexistence with other beliefs"?  Again, wrong.  Your perspective is so ridiculously dismissive of other people's experiences with sanctimonious Christians like you, that it's almost nauseating.  Northern Ireland ring a bell?  Remember Kim Davis?  What about atheists like me?  Not to mention your whole list here is the exact opposite of coexistence.  I might even have a bit more respect for your church if you all just admitted that you will never accept a United States where Christianity doesn't hold a vice-grip on the population.

"Equality of women"?  I darn near spit my drink when I read this one!  HA!  How can you even assert this nonsense, when there are just so many examples in the Bible to the contrary?  (Just take Lot's daughters, for a quick example.)  As a matter of fact, there are so many examples of sexual inequality in your Bible that if I took the time to compile a list of them, the list would be so long that it would just be easier to give you a list of the chapters.  So let's boil it down to one question, shall we?  Do Southern Baptists allow women Pastors?  No - 1 Timothy 2 and whatnot.  Again, this is a blatant lie and you know it.

For arguments sake, perhaps the context of this line-item was in reference to the first verse on the front of the flyer.  Indeed, Romans 3 does mention that everyone sins (multiple times, actually).  I don't know though, it just seems to me that female characters in the Bible tend to sin a tad bit more than their male counterparts.  Or perhaps it was put there to indulge a more feminist society evolving around us.  I mean, the numbers of people attending church are declining dramatically, and churches know it so they have to adapt or perish.  That means trying to convince the skeptical (like me) that they have ALWAYS recognized women as equal to men!  (Whatever...)  But in reality, my money is that this little nugget was included as a "friendly" reminder that most Muslim women cover their heads in one way or another, whereas Christian women are "free" to let the wind flow through their freshly dyed, bottle-blonde hair.

I'll conclude by saying that we have a very pleasant and friendly Muslim family who lives next door to us.  I don't live in fear of them, nor do I wish any ill upon them for their beliefs.  I can only hope that if this silly thing was placed on their door, (which judging by how churches like the NHBC of Wylie notoriously pepper subdivisions with religious propaganda, it was) they just ignored it and put it in the trash where it belongs.

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Phantom Faith

I spent the past week or so researching a fairly simple idea I had that I thought might help a few people understand themselves, and perhaps even understand one another.  After reading and listening to various people discussing their "journey" through their religious life, I think I finally have enough evidence to discuss it.

There is a common phenomenon I have noticed among two specific groups of people: those who believe in the God of the Bible but oftentimes question that belief, and those who once believed in the God of the Bible but now no longer do.  Thus, in this premise I'm excluding people who outwardly never admit to questioning the Bible or what's in it, and also excluding those people not raised with religion who generally believe that the Bible is nothing more than fan fiction.  I'll demonstrate the phenomenon with two scenarios, one with a skeptical theist and one with an introspective atheist.

Scenario 1:
A woman who is very active in her church realizes that there some things in the Bible she can never bring herself to accept.  She has a very close friend who is gay and she doesn't see anything wrong with it because to her, it's none of her business.  She also has several coworkers whom she thinks very highly of, but they follow other religions.  To her, they are all wonderful people and not one of them deserves to burn for eternity in Hell.  When the need arises, she dutifully serves on the church board and frequently gives her opinion to the Pastor and other church leaders even though the Bible speaks very specifically against this.  Yet with all of this internal turmoil, in the back of her mind she cannot bring herself to stop going to church.  A frightened little voice inside her worries that if she starts questioning her religion, her Pastor, or even her Bible, then she too will burn in Hell forever.  Thus, she gathers all of her doubts and stows them away by convincing herself that all the unpleasant things in the Bible are just fables anyway.
Scenario 2:
 A woman whose entire family is either moderately religious or fervently religious, and who was in fact raised by enthusiastic Christian parents, has decided that after years of research and study, she no longer believes in the God of the Bible.  She is comfortable in her decision, and decides that it is time to tell her family that she's an atheist.  She handles herself well through the squabbling and bickering between herself and other family members over her decision.  She even offers gestures of comfort and support as some of her family weep on her shoulder.  After all of the arguments, debates, and other emotional outbursts are finally over, and after most of her family have finally accepted who she is, there is still this lingering thought in her head that compels her to consider that they might be right and she might be wrong.  She finds that even in her lack of belief, she still struggles with the conclusions she has drawn based on her own rationality.
 Both of these scenarios have one common thread - that "phantom limb" of belief.  Or, what I'm calling "Phantom Faith".  Dozens of people's blogs that I read or videos that I watched all had this one common thread.  Granted, the Christian-turned-atheists were more likely to admit that they have this issue than the skeptic believer might, but in general they both seemed to have the same, "little voice" in the back of their minds.  It might not seem like much to either of them, but that tiny little nagging voice had wildly different results based on which person's mind was being affected.  On one hand, the nag caused the atheist to second-guess themselves a bit, or fear that they might still be wrong.  On the other, the skeptic theist fears real, physical pain on an eternal scale; a kind of pain that everyone who has ever had even a minor sunburn can attest to.

My thoughts on this phenomenon are that, in general, we're witnessing the result of precisely calculated and profoundly effective childhood indoctrination first hand.  If that is indeed the case, then it explains many things.  It explains why religious leaders insist that very young children should be exposed to their religious views, even though there is no way they have the experience nor the education to process it.  I often argue that this is why children are told whitewashed Biblical stories rather than what's actually written.  For example, if kids actually knew the entire story of Lot and his daughters, that whole pillar of salt thing would not nearly provoke the type of anxiety that it does when you omit the details.

And it also explains why religious leaders skip over various portions of the Bible in lieu of their own message or agenda.  I believe that religious leaders count on the fact that most people sitting in their congregation will accept his word over their own judgment.  These leaders also count on most people's lack of motivation to learn, especially in adults.  The religious leaders know that more often than not, people will only read the passages they he focuses on, and accept those passages in the context that he delivers it.  (Now I could be mistaken, but thus far I only see this type of careless acceptance occur in adults who were raised in religious homes.)

It is this phantom faith that compels perfectly sensible adults to accept things from the Bible that they would never accept from any other book.  It is this phantom faith that inclines Christians (or Muslims, as the case may be) to believe miraculous stories told by other Christians and disparage miraculous stories told by people of other faiths.  People tend to have very healthy skepticism when it comes to miracles performed by other gods or people of other faiths.  But as soon as they know their god did the miracle working, well that skepticism gets thrown out the window without a second thought.

They have been so conditioned by religion that their brain has accepted that belief as a literal body part, like an arm or a leg.  And once that phantom faith is perceived as an actual physical part of your body, it becomes extremely difficult to abandon it.  It's like telling someone in their 30's or 40's that if they cut off their finger they'll live to be 93 rather than die at 73.  It's easier to live now with your phantom faith than to lose it altogether.

The phenomenon is different with converted atheists, but it's still there.  When they actually do reach the point where they no longer accept there is a God and they sever that belief, that phantom faith still creates havoc in their mind.  Indeed, phantom faith induces chaos that can even be painful at times.

I guess my point is this:  Be mindful of what you are exposing yourself and your children to.  Understand the messages that your children are receiving, and exactly what feelings they have when they are introduced to them.  (Frankly, some of those stories are exceedingly harsh for youngsters and can most certainly be very frightening for them.)  Learn as much as you can about your religious text, and put that education to good use.  Do not accept that you cannot understand everything in it.  You can.  Give yourself enough credit as a functioning human adult to find out for yourself.  And above all, do not believe someone based on a well-rehearsed skit they perform every Sunday morning from a stage with perfect lighting.

You have the book right in front of you.  Read it.


For those of you reading this who might think they caught me comparing apples to oranges in my two scenarios, let me explain.  I purposely made the phantom faith in scenario one not as obvious.  The woman in scenario one is propping up the comfort she feels from her religious belief on phantom faith.  It is simply too difficult for her to make herself come to grips with what she feels is wrong about what her religion teaches.  Yet her phantom faith keeps her in check with the church.  Think about it this way, a man that has his leg amputated from the knee down is still able to stand provided he receives an artificial leg.  But that leg is still not his leg.  Similarly, as the woman in scenario one still believes she has her faith and her religion, it is certainly not the religion of the Bible.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Folks, This Has to STOP

I am truly disgusted at the latest video from the NRA.  With the publication of this kind of violent rhetoric, this organization has officially shown that they are no longer advocates for gun owners, but for gun manufacturers.  Watch this, if you can stomach it:

"They... They... They..."  Did you notice that?  "Their schools...  Their movie stars...  Their ex-president."

That type of language is pure propaganda designed to enflame an, "Us against them!" mentality.  And the NRA knows it.  It's no longer acceptable to just have a disagreement over how our country should be governed.  This organization now casts liberals as an enemy that needs to be fought with a, "clenched fist of truth."

Truth?  There is no truth in a video that is filled with dimwitted hyperbole without an ounce of real evidence.  And it doesn't take a genius to know that you mean a gun, you NRA assholes.

Casting fellow countrymen as enemies is dangerous, folks.  And it's sick to boot.  We are ALL Americans.  Not just the ones that have an (R) after their name; not just the ones that are Christians; not just the ones that are white; and not just the ones that are happy about the last election.  As if a peaceful march is a crime.  As if a peaceful protest is illegal.  As if calling out racism, or sexism, or xenophobia is wrong.  With this anti-democracy abomination of a video, this organization goes against everything that our great experiment represents.  Besides, the NRA categorically does NOT get to define who we are.

Oh I'm sure their lawyers will argue that they never advocated directly for violence.  And I'm also quite sure there are already people justifying this crap by suggesting that this is a message to the "far-left", not all liberals.  Whatever that means.  And as sad as I am to have to admit to this, I've even heard this kind of anti-liberal/liberals are the enemy stance from my own family.

I beg anyone who has a membership to this organization to cancel it, NOW.  Cancel it before their greed and corruption send our beloved country spiraling into another civil war.

Who knows?  That's likely what they want.

More gun sales, you know.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Concept Perversion

There has been something on my mind over the past few days which has led me to examine a couple of concepts that have been perverted by a vast majority of people: knowledge and courage.  I'll explore both of these in turn, with a bit of my aim (or slant?) directed toward interactions between individuals on social media.


I am reasonably comfortable assuming that a vast majority of people know someone, or are related to someone, who in casual conversation carelessly takes for granted that others may know as much as, or even more than, they do on a particular subject.  In particular, when it comes to complicated topics that affect a great number of people (say, politics or religion), these individuals tend to have intellectual blinders on that mask their own arrogant assumptions.  I know a few of these types, and over the years have found ways to - for the most part - deal with them without instigating a pointless argument.

(Now I'll take a quick moment here and mention that I am sure many of my friends and family would politely disagree with that last sentence, and respectfully remind me that oftentimes I have a penchant for voicing my opinion.  Indeed, there are times where I just can't help myself.  So I'll let you all have that one.)

With social media, on the other hand, many people today have a persistent habitual bias that most family and friends (or "connections") fit neatly into the same social bubble as they do.  They just assume that if they're conservative, then their family members must also be conservative.  If they're Christian, then their family members must also be Christian.  Rinse and repeat.

But when a friend or family member does burst their bubble of social bias, it can be a bit of a shock to people.  Sometimes it can even be a bit precarious for the person doing the disappointing, as controversial topics can cause otherwise easygoing people to become disturbingly hostile and shockingly cruel.  I have found that this is applicable for both older friends/family members and younger friends/family members.  Where older friends have difficulty recognizing the younger generations as fully capable and quite knowledgeable adults, younger friends audaciously promote their opinion without researching its validity.

(At different times in my life, I'll freely admit that I've been guilty of both.)

And it is in these situations where the corruption of knowledge creeps into the discussion.  It's become so commonplace with social media that people rarely even recognize it anymore.  Before my own exit from Facebook, I was constantly surprised at the myriad of posts I saw that had so little truth to them, yet so many people redistributed the lies without an ounce of skepticism.  As a matter of fact, it was one of the reasons I left.  People would proudly display their own "knowledge" that a particular political meme or religious quip or generic "the universe loves you" reflection must be true because the reader of said meme/quip/reflection believed it to be thus.  I hate to pick on Christians again, but seriously, just scroll a bit through your feed and without fail someone will have shared something about the Bible that is blatantly false.  Yet behind all the tens (or hundreds!) of likes, not a single person possessed the knowledge to recognize, nor point out, the lie.

I'll give you another example: the recent shooting at the GOP baseball practice.  Facebook conservatives just knew all those liberals were violent and crazy.  Yet none of them had the mindfulness to recall Jared Lee Loughner, or Edgar Madison Welch, or even Timothy McVeigh.

Which brings me to another reason I left - it was the spiteful way in which people responded when confronted with the inaccuracy of a shared post.  This kind of combativeness doesn't even necessarily come from the person sharing the post; I found on quite a few occasions that other family members or friends would come roaring to their rescue with even more flagrant falsehoods.  Not to mention that generally speaking, it's a no-win situation for the person pointing out the flaw in their bubble of bias.  Point it out to a younger family member and you're, "... picking on them".  Point it out to an older family member and you're, "... not being respectful."

Is this the beginnings of illiteracy?  No, not necessarily.  I do believe, however, that it's the beginnings of single-mindedness, which in turn leads to prejudice.

Knowledge is tricky, mind you, because there will always be someone that undoubtedly knows more on any given subject.  But it is the wisdom of skepticism that one can rely on to recognize when a complicated subject or an inconclusive topic sounds a little too good to be true, or fits a little too easily into your own bubble of bias.


If you ask several different people what courage means to them, you'll likely get anything from, "... standing up for what you believe in," to, "... defending our country."  And both of these are most assuredly true.

However, when it comes to what people perceive as courageous on social media, the concept has been recklessly twisted into a characteristic that no longer has respectable merit.

As a hypothetical example, let's say that you're an ardent follower of Leviticus 11 and believe that eating lobster is unclean, and therefore anyone that eats lobster is unclean before the Lord.  But to your dismay, it has become social acceptable to eat lobster as more and more people are willing to admit to everyone else that they forego Levitical law in order to be honest with themselves that they enjoy a well-prepared lobster.  The government even goes so far as to say that it is discriminatory and therefore illegal to alienate anyone who eats lobster.  Other friends you know begin acquiescing to those filthy lobster-eaters simply because, they say, it's none of anyone's business if another person eats lobster.  Their argument even goes so far as to ask, "Who cares what other people eat for dinner?"  Well the Lord does, that's who!

So you, a disciplined follower of Levitical law, unfriend or ignore as many of those disgusting, abominable lobster-eaters as possible.  "They're all sinners," you think.  "No matter what secular law says."  You're really flexing your religious muscle now...

So, you muster the "courage" to compose a brilliant and religiously conscientious post that anyone who eats lobster, and anyone who defends those who eat lobster, are behind the moral decay of our once God-fearing society.  And you know that deep down in your, "heart" that you're not trying to hurt, or be rude to all those indecent sinners.  Goodness, no!  You're just reminding them that what they are doing is in direct opposition to the law of the Bible.  Why, you even go so far as to say that in your post!

If you are reading this and have ever posted something similar, believe me when I say to you that you're not being courageous in the slightest.  You're just being an asshole.  An asshole that's pandering to other prejudiced assholes.  And you get off on the likes/shares from the other assholes that you already know agree with you.

Why is it not courageous to take a stand like that?  Because it doesn't take an ounce of courage to stand up in a room full of like-minded people sympathetic to your own bigotry and rattle off a parochial opinion piece where you know it is extremely unlikely that anybody will disagree.  That's why.

Real courage, I would argue, is whether you bother to take the time to listen to a person who might actually disagree with you, or acknowledging verifiable evidence refuting your current assumptions of what is factually accurate.  Real courage is whether you question your peers, your elders, and even your own deeply held beliefs, not grandstanding among amicable supporters.

                   *                    *                    *                    *                    *

Now, I encourage all three people who actually read this to chime in and join the discussion.  What do you think?

Monday, June 19, 2017

Selling the Supernatural


Getting into another person's automobile has always been a bit of an entertaining game for me.  I find that a person's car or truck is a fascinating window into that person's habits and quirks, especially if they spend a lot of time in their car on a daily basis.  And this is totally an anecdotal guess on my part, but most of the people I've ridden with likely don't even realize how much of themselves that they're exposing to their riders.  I'm betting it's because the passengers have a lot of time on their hands to be nosey, while the driver is predominately occupied with, you know, driving.

Okay, now that you have some background on my own, "inquisitive quirks," the reason I started a blog post in such a strange way is to segue into the fact that my family and I spent a lot of time in cabs and other shuttle services while we were on our most recent vacation.  (We also used the mass transit system as well, but that wasn't nearly as entertaining this time around.)  In doing so, we regularly found ourselves with plenty of interesting things to talk about after the ride.

Before I go on, I will say that some drivers were respectful, quiet, and the interior of their automobiles were extraordinarily clean.  And obviously they all got us to our destinations safely.  Well done, gents.

But this post is for you few drivers that seemed to awkwardly forget what you were listening to on the radio.  Because that's where it got really... REALLY interesting.

I heard heated discussions varying from the legality of political asylum, to the legitimacy of disclosing menstrual cycles to employers.  With the latter, I can only imagine how uncomfortable my teenage son must have felt listening to that contentious debate.  Anyway, the most laughable situation, by far, was our exposure to an extremely lively monologue, by a religious radio personality I've never even heard of, detailing how he had various god-given methods to provide the millennial generation with actual supernatural powers.

You read me right.  This guy was trying to sell super powers to young people.  Real, honest to Abe, X-Men style super powers.  He was using the god of the Bible to promote it.  And it wasn't a joke.

It wasn't a joke because we were forced to listen to this religious radio personality promote his superhuman regimen for at least 20 agonizingly hilarious minutes where, out of respect for the driver, we couldn't laugh our asses off.

You may snicker and dismiss this guy on the radio as a nut, but what he was selling is really just a modern twist on Christian beliefs and Biblical presumptions.  Before you think I'm as nuts as the, "Weapon X Program" promoting pastor on the radio, hear me out on this...  There really is no difference between that type of crazy and any other pastor who claims that the stories in the Bible are real.  For example, in the Bible a guy caused multiple plagues on a country, one poor woman was turned to a pillar of salt, a snake and a donkey spoke to people, one guy had colossal strength, one guy even walked on water and healed a blind dude with mud and spit...

See what I mean?

What I'm getting at is that while it's easy to ridicule a radio personality for trying to convince young people that they can possess supernatural powers, it's equally easy for most religious people to sit quietly feckless in church and accept the ridiculous stories being presented to them simply because those particular stories are wrapped in the protective presumptions of the authenticity of the Bible.  Why is that?  Why didn't the cab driver scoff at this nonsense and change the channel?  And for that matter, why is it easy for me to predict that most religious people reading this would think that radio personality is as nuts as I do, yet be perfectly comfortable believing any of the supernatural passages I listed above?

If god is your rationale for belief in the supernatural, then you totally missed the point.  If faith is your excuse, then I would argue that you're just being lazy.

Okay, I'll admit that it's really not fair for me to pick on this particular cab driver on this.  He stood out to me simply because riding in his cab/shuttle was definitely the most memorable.  And yes, I realize that he's not the only one.  I see this and hear this type of thing on a daily basis, automobile or no.  And some people reading this may also feel that it's not fair for me to pick on people that might believe the stories in the Bible.  But if you believe those supernatural stories in the Bible, why don't you immediately believe that this radio pastor can indeed give millennials super powers?

Answered Prayers

Most religious people I know are very skeptical of supernatural claims by people they don't know personally.  They get it that people lie - frequently - and thus they are generally not willing to accept an outrageous claim without some form of actual evidence.  However, what they generally have the most difficulty with is being equally skeptical of people that they know who claim that their prayers were answered by god herself.  All that is necessary for most religious people to believe a claim is to wrap it around a smidgen of, "I prayed about it..." or a pinch of, "I asked God..." and religious folks practically knock each other over just to fawn over his or her good fortune.  I mean, it basically gets believers into the religious equivalent of a piranha-style feeding frenzy with all the exclamations of, "Praise Jesus!" or, "Amen!" or, "Thank the Lord!"

Be that as it may, I've found that these answered prayers are never that extreme or over-the-top.  I'm assuming this is probably due some unspoken restriction where believers have to keep claims of answered prayers just under the threshold of other people's bullshit alarm.  Sure, there are those that think Jesus saved their house from a tornado when other people were killed by it, or that their god was good enough to leave a cross at the World Trade Center after allowing the death of over 3,000 people. But all in all most religious folks think even THAT kind of crap is nuts.

It's the people that believe their prayers are answered over the silliest of things that I honestly cannot tolerate.  Like finding a $20 dollar bill in their jacket pocket after praying to god for more money.  Or praising Jesus for putting that pair of jeans on sale so he or she could finally afford them.  Or worse yet, thanking god for curing your cancer after going through surgeries and/or various other medical treatments.  That kind of nonsense makes my blood boil.

Yet I rarely hear about instances where god simply couldn't be bothered to answer any prayers.  (Don't get me started on amputees or people who die from cancer even after aggressive treatment.)  And if I do hear anyone whining about an unanswered prayer, I can bet money that person will have the absolute perfect excuse for god.  So perfect in fact, that the excuses themselves appear designed to relieve god of any burden whatsoever.

God seems to have the perfect gig.

What you're witnessing here is the case where people ignore the failures and concentrate on the successes.  Gamblers do it, superstitious people do it, and sadly, very sick people do it.  In science terminology, we refer to this as confirmation bias, and it's every bit as dangerous as the people peddling the supernatural.  By ignoring the times that something fails, people are tilting the scale in favor of a lie.

It is this type of believing behavior that creates and maintains the idea that somehow, somewhere, there is something larger than what the universe allows.  It is this believing behavior that rationalizes a supernatural being taking time out of her busy schedule to spot you a $20.  Belief based solely on the requirement that all you need is a little faith.  Faith that god answered your prayer because you believe and are somehow special.  Faith that god intervened in the natural law of the universe in order to make sure you have a new pair of jeans.  Faith that against what you know is impossible, a supernatural being is looking out for you and yours.

Of course, if you've ever taken the time to wonder why god answered your prayer but couldn't be bothered to protect a child from being raped or couldn't take the time to keep people from starving, then you're on the right track.

In any event, that kind of supernatural crap is fine when writing fiction, and works really great when creating comic books.  But in the hands of people who know how to exploit others, it's essentially a ticking time bomb.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

He is risen!

My annual post in celebration of Eostre!

Sunday, March 12, 2017

The TSA Has Us Fearing Our Own Children

Normally I shy away from profanity as much has possible on my blog, but this subject has me boiling over to the point where I can no longer contain my disgust.

As always, you've been warned...

Recently while traveling with my family, I was absolutely disgusted to learn that the TSA now has the power to subject teens as early as 13 years-old to the full body scan.

That's right parents - your 13 year-old girl or boy gets the full, "I can see your tits and the size of your flaccid cock" body scan.

Normally I try to stay as calm and cooperative as possible during this monumental breach of my personal liberties, supposed constitutional rights, and basic human dignity.  But when I saw how dismissively the autocratic TSA agent ordered my 14 year-old teenage boy through the full body scanner, I simply couldn't hold my tongue.  I made it a point to say, "Well, that's completely disgusting." And while pointing at my poor son assuming the position in the scanner, I asked, "Doesn't that qualify as pedophilia?"

It was the moment I noticed how easy it was for the TSA rent-a-cop agents to ignore me when I knew my country had gone completely insane.  So insane, that I question whether these people are actually my countrymen.

How is it that collectively our society has become so afraid of each other?  I'm literally dumbfounded.  How is it that we have become so afraid of some anonymous brown bogeyman with an oddly shaped hat that we're willing to accept a government sponsored administration that is recklessly performing acts that would get any other ordinary citizen convicted of pedophilia?

You think I'm being overdramatic?  Well, then let's take a moment and review a couple of hypothetical scenarios.

Let's say there's some guy, maybe a pastor in Mississippi, Alabama, or Arkansas, who has placed cameras in the church's bathrooms to take photographs of his constituent's daughters while they are using the restroom.  Would you be offended?

How about this.  Let's say there's an idiot walking around malls with a mirror attached to the top of his shoe where he can take pictures of 13 year-old boy's junk while he's using a urinal in the restroom.  Would THAT make you angry?

I hope so!  Because a judge would happily throw the book at both of those hypothetical asshats.

But this, ladies and gentlemen, is essentially your Transportation Security Administration.  This government funded administration is legally allowed to take pictures of your kid's junk on a daily basis.  And thus far, not one Senator or Representative in the House has argued against these new predatory, "regulations".

To put it simply, we are at the mercy of a complicit, recklessly abusive, over-reaching, predatory state.

Hell, maybe all these raunchy out-of-work pastors and horny youth ministers that we see getting arrested on a weekly basis can land a job at the TSA rather than risk the considerable investment of grooming their unsuspecting (and completely innocent) victims.  Think about it, these assholes can get everything their twisted brain desires.  And they get the added bonus of the gleeful consent, or "blessing" if you will, of their remarkably gullible, yet pretentiously principled parents, who are perfectly willing to allow completely nude images to be taken of their teenage children.

I mean, statistically speaking a child in the United States is more likely to be molested or raped by a family member or by a priest, pastor, or some form of religious leader.

That is, until now.

Leave it to the US Government to offer twisted fucks like these people the authority to sexually abuse hundreds, even thousands, of children every day!